From af63ab2b6935b7468dbaad242b3bee84ed3e1cbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marshall Clow Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:39:58 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Mark #2759 as ready and #2755 as complete llvm-svn: 283222 --- libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html b/libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html index 2a3883b..ac37a6a 100644 --- a/libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html +++ b/libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html @@ -121,9 +121,9 @@ 2752"Throws:" clauses of async and packaged_task are unimplementableIssaquah 2753Optional's constructors and assignments need constraintsIssaquah 2754The in_place constructors and emplace functions added by P0032R3 don't require CopyConstructibleIssaquah - 2755§[string.view.io] uses non-existent basic_string_view::to_string functionIssaquah + 2755§[string.view.io] uses non-existent basic_string_view::to_string functionIssaquahWe already do this 2756C++ WP optional should 'forward' T's implicit conversionsIssaquah - 2759gcd / lcm and bool for the WPIssaquah + 2759gcd / lcm and bool for the WPIssaquahPatch ready 2760non-const basic_string::data should not invalidate iteratorsIssaquahNothing to do 2765Did LWG 1123 go too far?Issaquah 2767not_fn call_wrapper can form invalid typesIssaquah @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
  • 2686 -
  • 2694 -
  • 2696 -
    • -
  • 2699 -
    • +
  • 2699 - I don't think this requires any code changes; look more closely.
  • 2712 -
  • 2722 -
  • 2729 -
    • @@ -195,9 +195,9 @@
  • 2752 -
  • 2753 -
  • 2754 -
    • -
  • 2755 -
    • +
  • 2755 - Both string and string_view call a common routine for output; so no code changes needed.
  • 2756 -
    • -
  • 2759 -
    • +
  • 2759 - Patch and tests ready
  • 2760 - This is just wording cleanup; no code or test changes needed.
  • 2765 -
  • 2767 -
    • -- 2.7.4