From ae3f719300816865489abd44c91c821859daa26f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ZiyangZhang Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 23:39:13 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ublk_drv: check 'current' instead of 'ubq_daemon' This check is not atomic. So with recovery feature, ubq_daemon may be modified simultaneously by recovery task. Instead, check 'current' is safe here because 'current' never changes. Also add comment explaining this check, which is really important for understanding recovery feature. Signed-off-by: ZiyangZhang Reviewed-by: Ming Lei Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220923153919.44078-2-ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c index 6a4a94b..c39b67d 100644 --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c @@ -645,14 +645,22 @@ static inline void __ublk_rq_task_work(struct request *req) struct ublk_device *ub = ubq->dev; int tag = req->tag; struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[tag]; - bool task_exiting = current != ubq->ubq_daemon || ubq_daemon_is_dying(ubq); unsigned int mapped_bytes; pr_devel("%s: complete: op %d, qid %d tag %d io_flags %x addr %llx\n", __func__, io->cmd->cmd_op, ubq->q_id, req->tag, io->flags, ublk_get_iod(ubq, req->tag)->addr); - if (unlikely(task_exiting)) { + /* + * Task is exiting if either: + * + * (1) current != ubq_daemon. + * io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task() tries to run task_work + * in a workqueue if ubq_daemon(cmd's task) is PF_EXITING. + * + * (2) current->flags & PF_EXITING. + */ + if (unlikely(current != ubq->ubq_daemon || current->flags & PF_EXITING)) { blk_mq_end_request(req, BLK_STS_IOERR); mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &ub->monitor_work, 0); return; -- 2.7.4