From ad9ee9f53c5b6594ca5c3676102280790c110ca6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Rix Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:51:32 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/gv100: use static for gv100_disp_core_mthd_[base|sor] Sparse reports these issues coregv100.c:27:1: warning: symbol 'gv100_disp_core_mthd_base' was not declared. Should it be static? coregv100.c:43:1: warning: symbol 'gv100_disp_core_mthd_sor' was not declared. Should it be static? These variables are only used in coregv100.c. Single file use variables should be static, so add static to their storage-class specifier. Signed-off-by: Tom Rix Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220422185132.3163248-1-trix@redhat.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/coregv100.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/coregv100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/coregv100.c index 448a515..1d333c4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/coregv100.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/coregv100.c @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ #include -const struct nv50_disp_mthd_list +static const struct nv50_disp_mthd_list gv100_disp_core_mthd_base = { .mthd = 0x0000, .addr = 0x000000, @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ gv100_disp_core_mthd_base = { } }; -const struct nv50_disp_mthd_list +static const struct nv50_disp_mthd_list gv100_disp_core_mthd_sor = { .mthd = 0x0020, .addr = 0x000020, -- 2.7.4