From a9ad4d87aa263de36895402b66115a3a4b88bf1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Qu Wenruo Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 16:06:11 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: raid56: make error_bitmap update atomic In the rework of raid56 code, there is very limited concurrency in the endio context. Most of the work is done inside the sectors arrays, which different bios will never touch the same sector. But there is a concurrency here for error_bitmap. Both read and write endio functions need to touch them, and we can have multiple write bios touching the same error bitmap if they all hit some errors. Here we fix the unprotected bitmap operation by going set_bit() in a loop. Since we have a very small ceiling of the sectors (at most 16 sectors), such set_bit() in a loop should be very acceptable. Fixes: 2942a50dea74 ("btrfs: raid56: introduce btrfs_raid_bio::error_bitmap") Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/raid56.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c index f35898a..ff4b1d5 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c @@ -1426,12 +1426,20 @@ static void rbio_update_error_bitmap(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio, struct bio *bi u32 bio_size = 0; struct bio_vec *bvec; struct bvec_iter_all iter_all; + int i; bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) bio_size += bvec->bv_len; - bitmap_set(rbio->error_bitmap, total_sector_nr, - bio_size >> rbio->bioc->fs_info->sectorsize_bits); + /* + * Since we can have multiple bios touching the error_bitmap, we cannot + * call bitmap_set() without protection. + * + * Instead use set_bit() for each bit, as set_bit() itself is atomic. + */ + for (i = total_sector_nr; i < total_sector_nr + + (bio_size >> rbio->bioc->fs_info->sectorsize_bits); i++) + set_bit(i, rbio->error_bitmap); } /* Verify the data sectors at read time. */ -- 2.7.4