From a86ca83a1b1817457837540e0bc8dd26db75407c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 16:08:10 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] doc: Remove redundant sentence about modules being in C++20 As C++20 has already been published, we don't need to link to the draft (which is now the C++23 draft anyway). And there's no need to say it's part of the C++20 spec, or that there might be defect reports. That's true for everything in C++20, so calling it out here just for Modules isn't needed. gcc/ChangeLog: * doc/invoke.texi (C++ Modules): Remove anachronism. --- gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi index 248ed53..b01ffab 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi @@ -34151,9 +34151,7 @@ provides a modular compilation system, intending to provide both faster builds and better library isolation. The ``Merging Modules'' paper @uref{https://wg21.link/p1103}, provides the easiest to read set of changes to the standard, although it does not capture later -changes. That specification is now part of C++20, -@uref{git@@github.com:cplusplus/draft.git}, it is considered complete -(there may be defect reports to come). +changes. @emph{G++'s modules support is not complete.} Other than bugs, the known missing pieces are: -- 2.7.4