From a744490f12707d9f0b205272b29adf5bdb3ba193 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Juri Lelli Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:40:51 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: remove stale comment After commit 794a56ebd9a57 (sched/cpufreq: Change the worker kthread to SCHED_DEADLINE) schedutil kthreads are "ignored" for a clock frequency selection point of view, so the potential corner case for RT tasks is not possible at all now. Remove the stale comment mentioning it. Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 13 ------------- 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c index d2c6083..23ef190 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c @@ -396,19 +396,6 @@ static void sugov_irq_work(struct irq_work *irq_work) sg_policy = container_of(irq_work, struct sugov_policy, irq_work); - /* - * For RT tasks, the schedutil governor shoots the frequency to maximum. - * Special care must be taken to ensure that this kthread doesn't result - * in the same behavior. - * - * This is (mostly) guaranteed by the work_in_progress flag. The flag is - * updated only at the end of the sugov_work() function and before that - * the schedutil governor rejects all other frequency scaling requests. - * - * There is a very rare case though, where the RT thread yields right - * after the work_in_progress flag is cleared. The effects of that are - * neglected for now. - */ kthread_queue_work(&sg_policy->worker, &sg_policy->work); } -- 2.7.4