From a70a16279b57a1b432b27e8b15d0377583bdb21f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicholas Clark Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:22:13 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Assume that if runperl is called under tainting, that the caller really really wanted to run perl, so brute force untaint everything. p4raw-id: //depot/perl@27220 --- t/test.pl | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/t/test.pl b/t/test.pl index 95aa87f..4e00816 100644 --- a/t/test.pl +++ b/t/test.pl @@ -481,6 +481,15 @@ sub runperl { die "test.pl:runperl() does not take a hashref" if ref $_[0] and ref $_[0] eq 'HASH'; my $runperl = &_create_runperl; + if (${^TAINT}) { + # We will assume that if you're running under -T, you really mean + # to run a fresh perl, so we'll brute force launder everything for + # you + foreach ($runperl, $ENV{PATH}) { + $_ =~ /(.*)/s; + $_ = $1; + } + } my $result = `$runperl`; $result =~ s/\n\n/\n/ if $is_vms; # XXX pipes sometimes double these return $result; -- 2.7.4