From a6642c724ba3d83b31349dfd9e0e569fa13e96e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?utf8?q?=C3=86var=20Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0=20Bjarmason?= <avar@cpan.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 23:07:15 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] pod/perlintro: mention that "foreach" is really a synonym for
 "for"

The perlintro section on for/foreach would have you believe that "for"
is always C-style and "foreach" is always Perl-style. This isn't
actually the case, so link to the perlsyn section that covers that.
---
 pod/perlintro.pod | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/pod/perlintro.pod b/pod/perlintro.pod
index 5e2fe5c..5a84f32 100644
--- a/pod/perlintro.pod
+++ b/pod/perlintro.pod
@@ -407,6 +407,9 @@ the more friendly list scanning C<foreach> loop.
         print "The value of $key is $hash{$key}\n";
     }
 
+The C<foreach> keyword is actually a synonym for the C<for>
+keyword. See C<L<perlsyn/"Foreach Loops">.
+
 =back
 
 For more detail on looping constructs (and some that weren't mentioned in
-- 
2.7.4