From a5f925bccce7b0dc083f0c5a8652600881cc38ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Trond Myklebust Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 09:47:32 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] NFS: Don't abuse NFS_INO_REVAL_FORCED in nfs_post_op_update_inode_locked() The NFS_INO_REVAL_FORCED flag now really only has meaning for the case when we've just been handed a delegation for a file that was already cached, and we're unsure about that cache. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust --- fs/nfs/inode.c | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c index a0cd796..5561d78b 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c @@ -1550,13 +1550,6 @@ static int nfs_post_op_update_inode_locked(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr { unsigned long invalid = NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR; - /* - * Don't revalidate the pagecache if we hold a delegation, but do - * force an attribute update - */ - if (NFS_PROTO(inode)->have_delegation(inode, FMODE_READ)) - invalid = NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR|NFS_INO_REVAL_FORCED; - if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) invalid |= NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA; nfs_set_cache_invalid(inode, invalid); -- 2.7.4