From a5b2fd8cdc576688c65aec82c775fd779d48b503 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:33:27 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Convert wait_for(I915_READ(reg)) to intel_wait_for_register() By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-44-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c index d299a3d..bce44ec 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c @@ -531,9 +531,11 @@ static void hsw_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & ~EDP_PSR_ENABLE); /* Wait till PSR is idle */ - if (_wait_for((I915_READ(EDP_PSR_STATUS_CTL) & - EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK) == 0, - 2 * USEC_PER_SEC, 10 * USEC_PER_MSEC)) + if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, + EDP_PSR_STATUS_CTL, + EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK, + 0, + 2000)) DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle State\n"); dev_priv->psr.active = false; -- 2.7.4