From a2f6a7ac60e234810a386aaa6aad106927c39c4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 15:28:31 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Warn users while freeing active policy With the new design in place, the show() and store() callbacks check if the policy is active or not before proceeding any further to avoid potential races. And in order to guarantee that cpufreq_policy_free() must be called after clearing the policy->cpus mask, i.e. by marking the policy inactive. In order to avoid introducing a bug around this later, print a warning message if we end up freeing an active policy. Also update cpufreq_online() a bit to make sure we clear the cpus mask for each error case before calling cpufreq_policy_free(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 73432360..954eef266 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1273,6 +1273,13 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) unsigned long flags; int cpu; + /* + * The callers must ensure the policy is inactive by now, to avoid any + * races with show()/store() callbacks. + */ + if (unlikely(!policy_is_inactive(policy))) + pr_warn("%s: Freeing active policy\n", __func__); + /* Remove policy from list */ write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); list_del(&policy->policy_list); @@ -1527,8 +1534,6 @@ out_destroy_policy: for_each_cpu(j, policy->real_cpus) remove_cpu_dev_symlink(policy, j, get_cpu_device(j)); - cpumask_clear(policy->cpus); - out_offline_policy: if (cpufreq_driver->offline) cpufreq_driver->offline(policy); @@ -1538,6 +1543,7 @@ out_exit_policy: cpufreq_driver->exit(policy); out_free_policy: + cpumask_clear(policy->cpus); up_write(&policy->rwsem); cpufreq_policy_free(policy); -- 2.7.4