From 9ffa68f65416094714c63ed1db219493e84fe21d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 11:23:49 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] iio: health: max30102: Mark expected switch fall-throughs In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I placed the "fall through" annotation at the bottom of the case, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1458342 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1458345 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- drivers/iio/health/max30102.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/health/max30102.c b/drivers/iio/health/max30102.c index 15ccadc..3e29562 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/health/max30102.c +++ b/drivers/iio/health/max30102.c @@ -282,9 +282,11 @@ static int max30102_read_measurement(struct max30102_data *data, switch (measurements) { case 3: MAX30102_COPY_DATA(2); - case 2: /* fall-through */ + /* fall through */ + case 2: MAX30102_COPY_DATA(1); - case 1: /* fall-through */ + /* fall through */ + case 1: MAX30102_COPY_DATA(0); break; default: -- 2.7.4