From 9b8a4a188a91dcc8ae9d28aeec6121b5b28ac818 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sven Van Asbroeck Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:07:31 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] dmaengine: imx-sdma: fix use-after-free on probe error path [ Upstream commit 2b8066c3deb9140fdf258417a51479b2aeaa7622 ] If probe() fails anywhere beyond the point where sdma_get_firmware() is called, then a kernel oops may occur. Problematic sequence of events: 1. probe() calls sdma_get_firmware(), which schedules the firmware callback to run when firmware becomes available, using the sdma instance structure as the context 2. probe() encounters an error, which deallocates the sdma instance structure 3. firmware becomes available, firmware callback is called with deallocated sdma instance structure 4. use after free - kernel oops ! Solution: only attempt to load firmware when we're certain that probe() will succeed. This guarantees that the firmware callback's context will remain valid. Note that the remove() path is unaffected by this issue: the firmware loader will increment the driver module's use count, ensuring that the module cannot be unloaded while the firmware callback is pending or running. Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck Reviewed-by: Robin Gong [vkoul: fixed braces for if condition] Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c index 84856ac..9f240b2 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c @@ -1821,27 +1821,6 @@ static int sdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (pdata && pdata->script_addrs) sdma_add_scripts(sdma, pdata->script_addrs); - if (pdata) { - ret = sdma_get_firmware(sdma, pdata->fw_name); - if (ret) - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "failed to get firmware from platform data\n"); - } else { - /* - * Because that device tree does not encode ROM script address, - * the RAM script in firmware is mandatory for device tree - * probe, otherwise it fails. - */ - ret = of_property_read_string(np, "fsl,sdma-ram-script-name", - &fw_name); - if (ret) - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "failed to get firmware name\n"); - else { - ret = sdma_get_firmware(sdma, fw_name); - if (ret) - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "failed to get firmware from device tree\n"); - } - } - sdma->dma_device.dev = &pdev->dev; sdma->dma_device.device_alloc_chan_resources = sdma_alloc_chan_resources; @@ -1883,6 +1862,33 @@ static int sdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) of_node_put(spba_bus); } + /* + * Kick off firmware loading as the very last step: + * attempt to load firmware only if we're not on the error path, because + * the firmware callback requires a fully functional and allocated sdma + * instance. + */ + if (pdata) { + ret = sdma_get_firmware(sdma, pdata->fw_name); + if (ret) + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "failed to get firmware from platform data\n"); + } else { + /* + * Because that device tree does not encode ROM script address, + * the RAM script in firmware is mandatory for device tree + * probe, otherwise it fails. + */ + ret = of_property_read_string(np, "fsl,sdma-ram-script-name", + &fw_name); + if (ret) { + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "failed to get firmware name\n"); + } else { + ret = sdma_get_firmware(sdma, fw_name); + if (ret) + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "failed to get firmware from device tree\n"); + } + } + return 0; err_register: -- 2.7.4