From 9b7fa33fda0fd29c8c329d9206186bbc9c449d37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Geliang Tang Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 20:25:19 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mptcp: add address into userspace pm list commit 24430f8bf51655c5ab7ddc2fafe939dd3cd0dd47 upstream. Add the address into userspace_pm_local_addr_list when the subflow is created. Make sure it can be found in mptcp_nl_cmd_remove(). And delete it in the new helper mptcp_userspace_pm_delete_local_addr(). By doing this, the "REMOVE" command also works with subflows that have been created via the "SUB_CREATE" command instead of restricting to the addresses that have been announced via the "ANNOUNCE" command. Fixes: d9a4594edabf ("mptcp: netlink: Add MPTCP_PM_CMD_REMOVE") Link: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/379 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c b/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c index a0c1e32..7726e08 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c @@ -78,6 +78,30 @@ int mptcp_userspace_pm_append_new_local_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk, return ret; } +/* If the subflow is closed from the other peer (not via a + * subflow destroy command then), we want to keep the entry + * not to assign the same ID to another address and to be + * able to send RM_ADDR after the removal of the subflow. + */ +static int mptcp_userspace_pm_delete_local_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk, + struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *addr) +{ + struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry, *tmp; + + list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &msk->pm.userspace_pm_local_addr_list, list) { + if (mptcp_addresses_equal(&entry->addr, &addr->addr, false)) { + /* TODO: a refcount is needed because the entry can + * be used multiple times (e.g. fullmesh mode). + */ + list_del_rcu(&entry->list); + kfree(entry); + return 0; + } + } + + return -EINVAL; +} + int mptcp_userspace_pm_get_flags_and_ifindex_by_id(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int id, u8 *flags, int *ifindex) @@ -250,6 +274,7 @@ int mptcp_nl_cmd_sf_create(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) struct nlattr *raddr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR_REMOTE]; struct nlattr *token = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_TOKEN]; struct nlattr *laddr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR]; + struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry local = { 0 }; struct mptcp_addr_info addr_r; struct mptcp_addr_info addr_l; struct mptcp_sock *msk; @@ -301,12 +326,24 @@ int mptcp_nl_cmd_sf_create(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) goto create_err; } + local.addr = addr_l; + err = mptcp_userspace_pm_append_new_local_addr(msk, &local); + if (err < 0) { + GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "did not match address and id"); + goto create_err; + } + lock_sock(sk); err = __mptcp_subflow_connect(sk, &addr_l, &addr_r); release_sock(sk); + spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); + if (err) + mptcp_userspace_pm_delete_local_addr(msk, &local); + spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); + create_err: sock_put((struct sock *)msk); return err; @@ -419,7 +456,11 @@ int mptcp_nl_cmd_sf_destroy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) ssk = mptcp_nl_find_ssk(msk, &addr_l, &addr_r); if (ssk) { struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk); + struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry entry = { .addr = addr_l }; + spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); + mptcp_userspace_pm_delete_local_addr(msk, &entry); + spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); mptcp_subflow_shutdown(sk, ssk, RCV_SHUTDOWN | SEND_SHUTDOWN); mptcp_close_ssk(sk, ssk, subflow); MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW); -- 2.7.4