From 9af42a4f6d81b96b123f3ec22a4dcb906c6d00e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 21:31:27 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] wireguard: socket: ignore v6 endpoints when ipv6 is disabled commit 77fc73ac89be96ec8f39e8efa53885caa7cb3645 upstream. The previous commit fixed a memory leak on the send path in the event that IPv6 is disabled at compile time, but how did a packet even arrive there to begin with? It turns out we have previously allowed IPv6 endpoints even when IPv6 support is disabled at compile time. This is awkward and inconsistent. Instead, let's just ignore all things IPv6, the same way we do other malformed endpoints, in the case where IPv6 is disabled. Fixes: e7096c131e51 ("net: WireGuard secure network tunnel") Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c b/drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c index 467eef0..0414d7a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ int wg_socket_endpoint_from_skb(struct endpoint *endpoint, endpoint->addr4.sin_addr.s_addr = ip_hdr(skb)->saddr; endpoint->src4.s_addr = ip_hdr(skb)->daddr; endpoint->src_if4 = skb->skb_iif; - } else if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) { + } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) && skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) { endpoint->addr6.sin6_family = AF_INET6; endpoint->addr6.sin6_port = udp_hdr(skb)->source; endpoint->addr6.sin6_addr = ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr; @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ void wg_socket_set_peer_endpoint(struct wg_peer *peer, peer->endpoint.addr4 = endpoint->addr4; peer->endpoint.src4 = endpoint->src4; peer->endpoint.src_if4 = endpoint->src_if4; - } else if (endpoint->addr.sa_family == AF_INET6) { + } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) && endpoint->addr.sa_family == AF_INET6) { peer->endpoint.addr6 = endpoint->addr6; peer->endpoint.src6 = endpoint->src6; } else { -- 2.7.4