From 99d255861e288b40cb88d0a186ea1b22d9e1eddf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Juergen Gross Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 07:57:42 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] xen: make xen_qlock_wait() nestable commit a856531951dc8094359dfdac21d59cee5969c18e upstream. xen_qlock_wait() isn't safe for nested calls due to interrupts. A call of xen_qlock_kick() might be ignored in case a deeper nesting level was active right before the call of xen_poll_irq(): CPU 1: CPU 2: spin_lock(lock1) spin_lock(lock1) -> xen_qlock_wait() -> xen_clear_irq_pending() Interrupt happens spin_unlock(lock1) -> xen_qlock_kick(CPU 2) spin_lock_irqsave(lock2) spin_lock_irqsave(lock2) -> xen_qlock_wait() -> xen_clear_irq_pending() clears kick for lock1 -> xen_poll_irq() spin_unlock_irq_restore(lock2) -> xen_qlock_kick(CPU 2) wakes up spin_unlock_irq_restore(lock2) IRET resumes in xen_qlock_wait() -> xen_poll_irq() never wakes up The solution is to disable interrupts in xen_qlock_wait() and not to poll for the irq in case xen_qlock_wait() is called in nmi context. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Waiman.Long@hp.com Cc: peterz@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c | 24 ++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c index cd210a4..e8d880e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c @@ -39,29 +39,25 @@ static void xen_qlock_kick(int cpu) */ static void xen_qlock_wait(u8 *byte, u8 val) { + unsigned long flags; int irq = __this_cpu_read(lock_kicker_irq); /* If kicker interrupts not initialized yet, just spin */ - if (irq == -1) + if (irq == -1 || in_nmi()) return; - /* If irq pending already clear it and return. */ + /* Guard against reentry. */ + local_irq_save(flags); + + /* If irq pending already clear it. */ if (xen_test_irq_pending(irq)) { xen_clear_irq_pending(irq); - return; + } else if (READ_ONCE(*byte) == val) { + /* Block until irq becomes pending (or a spurious wakeup) */ + xen_poll_irq(irq); } - if (READ_ONCE(*byte) != val) - return; - - /* - * If an interrupt happens here, it will leave the wakeup irq - * pending, which will cause xen_poll_irq() to return - * immediately. - */ - - /* Block until irq becomes pending (or perhaps a spurious wakeup) */ - xen_poll_irq(irq); + local_irq_restore(flags); } static irqreturn_t dummy_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) -- 2.7.4