From 9948bb6a6db6ad6a8bf2ccaaceb780404f1f43df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steven Whitehouse Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 06:30:25 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] decnet: Use data ready call back, rather than hand coding it Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/decnet/dn_nsp_in.c | 17 ++++------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/decnet/dn_nsp_in.c b/net/decnet/dn_nsp_in.c index 5d8a2a5..932408d 100644 --- a/net/decnet/dn_nsp_in.c +++ b/net/decnet/dn_nsp_in.c @@ -578,6 +578,7 @@ out: static __inline__ int dn_queue_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int sig, struct sk_buff_head *queue) { int err; + int skb_len; /* Cast skb->rcvbuf to unsigned... It's pointless, but reduces number of warnings when compiling with -W --ANK @@ -592,22 +593,12 @@ static __inline__ int dn_queue_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int sig if (err) goto out; + skb_len = skb->len; skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk); skb_queue_tail(queue, skb); - /* This code only runs from BH or BH protected context. - * Therefore the plain read_lock is ok here. -DaveM - */ - read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); - if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) { - struct socket *sock = sk->sk_socket; - wake_up_interruptible(sk->sk_sleep); - if (sock && sock->fasync_list && - !test_bit(SOCK_ASYNC_WAITDATA, &sock->flags)) - __kill_fasync(sock->fasync_list, sig, - (sig == SIGURG) ? POLL_PRI : POLL_IN); - } - read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); + if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) + sk->sk_data_ready(sk, skb_len); out: return err; } -- 2.7.4