From 929afa0092d0ea6be2fbd0ac087319092595eba6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adrian Hunter Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 16:00:15 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] perf time-utils: Make perf_time__parse_for_ranges() more logical Explicit time ranges never contain a percent sign whereas percentage ranges always do, so it is possible to call the correct parser. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter Cc: Jin Yao Cc: Jiri Olsa Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604130017.31207-18-adrian.hunter@intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/util/time-utils.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c index 9a46375..d942840 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c @@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str, struct perf_time_interval **ranges, int *range_size, int *range_num) { + bool has_percent = strchr(time_str, '%'); struct perf_time_interval *ptime_range; int size, num, ret = -EINVAL; @@ -409,7 +410,7 @@ int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str, if (!ptime_range) return -ENOMEM; - if (perf_time__parse_str(ptime_range, time_str) != 0) { + if (has_percent) { if (session->evlist->first_sample_time == 0 && session->evlist->last_sample_time == 0) { pr_err("HINT: no first/last sample time found in perf data.\n" @@ -427,6 +428,8 @@ int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str, if (num < 0) goto error_invalid; } else { + if (perf_time__parse_str(ptime_range, time_str)) + goto error_invalid; num = 1; } -- 2.7.4