From 91d4b3fd9a4b06ebd6ae324713f8c05bce15a43e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Kenner Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 19:33:42 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] sparc.h (CAN_ELMINIATE): Can only eliminate FP in favor of SP if FRAME_POINTER_REQUIRED is false. * config/sparc/sparc.h (CAN_ELMINIATE): Can only eliminate FP in favor of SP if FRAME_POINTER_REQUIRED is false. From-SVN: r51032 --- gcc/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ gcc/config/sparc/sparc.h | 7 ++++++- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index fbaee55..58f6ea9 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +Tue Mar 19 14:12:32 2002 Richard Kenner + + * config/sparc/sparc.h (CAN_ELMINIATE): Can only eliminate FP + in favor of SP if FRAME_POINTER_REQUIRED is false. + 2002-03-19 Lars Brinkhoff * emit-rtl.c (gen_int_mode): New function. diff --git a/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.h b/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.h index e765973..89f5e07 100644 --- a/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.h +++ b/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.h @@ -1570,7 +1570,12 @@ extern const char leaf_reg_remap[]; {{ FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM, STACK_POINTER_REGNUM}, \ { FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM, HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM} } -#define CAN_ELIMINATE(FROM, TO) 1 +/* The way this is structured, we can't eliminate SFP in favor of SP + if the frame pointer is required: we want to use the SFP->HFP elimination + in that case. But the test in update_eliminables doesn't know we are + assuming below that we only do the former elimination. */ +#define CAN_ELIMINATE(FROM, TO) \ + ((TO) == HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM || !FRAME_POINTER_REQUIRED) #define INITIAL_ELIMINATION_OFFSET(FROM, TO, OFFSET) \ do { \ -- 2.7.4