From 8c03af3e090e9d57d90f482d344563dd4bae1e66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 12:04:50 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] x86,retpoline: Be sure to emit INT3 after JMP *%\reg Both AMD and Intel recommend using INT3 after an indirect JMP. Make sure to emit one when rewriting the retpoline JMP irrespective of compiler SLS options or even CONFIG_SLS. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Yxm+QkFPOhrVSH6q@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net --- arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 9 +++++++++ arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c index 62f6b8b..68d84cf 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c @@ -453,6 +453,15 @@ static int patch_retpoline(void *addr, struct insn *insn, u8 *bytes) return ret; i += ret; + /* + * The compiler is supposed to EMIT an INT3 after every unconditional + * JMP instruction due to AMD BTC. However, if the compiler is too old + * or SLS isn't enabled, we still need an INT3 after indirect JMPs + * even on Intel. + */ + if (op == JMP32_INSN_OPCODE && i < insn->length) + bytes[i++] = INT3_INSN_OPCODE; + for (; i < insn->length;) bytes[i++] = BYTES_NOP1; diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index c1f6c1c..4922517 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -419,7 +419,9 @@ static void emit_indirect_jump(u8 **pprog, int reg, u8 *ip) OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(reg); emit_jump(&prog, &__x86_indirect_thunk_array[reg], ip); } else { - EMIT2(0xFF, 0xE0 + reg); + EMIT2(0xFF, 0xE0 + reg); /* jmp *%\reg */ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RETPOLINE) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLS)) + EMIT1(0xCC); /* int3 */ } *pprog = prog; -- 2.7.4