From 853acaf064acf3aad6189b36de814bd381d35133 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 15:23:45 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] x86/hpet: Remove unused parameter from hpet_next_event() The clockevent device pointer is not used in this function. While at it, rename the misnamed 'timer' parameter to 'channel', which makes it clear what this parameter means. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ricardo Neri Cc: Ashok Raj Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Ravi Shankar Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190623132434.447880978@linutronix.de --- arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c index 76d63ed..b2ec52a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c @@ -347,15 +347,14 @@ static int hpet_resume(struct clock_event_device *evt) return 0; } -static int hpet_next_event(unsigned long delta, - struct clock_event_device *evt, int timer) +static int hpet_next_event(unsigned long delta, int channel) { u32 cnt; s32 res; cnt = hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER); cnt += (u32) delta; - hpet_writel(cnt, HPET_Tn_CMP(timer)); + hpet_writel(cnt, HPET_Tn_CMP(channel)); /* * HPETs are a complete disaster. The compare register is @@ -407,7 +406,7 @@ static int hpet_legacy_resume(struct clock_event_device *evt) static int hpet_legacy_next_event(unsigned long delta, struct clock_event_device *evt) { - return hpet_next_event(delta, evt, 0); + return hpet_next_event(delta, 0); } /* @@ -508,7 +507,8 @@ static int hpet_msi_next_event(unsigned long delta, struct clock_event_device *evt) { struct hpet_dev *hdev = EVT_TO_HPET_DEV(evt); - return hpet_next_event(delta, evt, hdev->num); + + return hpet_next_event(delta, hdev->num); } static irqreturn_t hpet_interrupt_handler(int irq, void *data) -- 2.7.4