From 849063074a84fe388a15f5655bc26fdf3290a2ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:39:44 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] wimax: usb-fw: mark expected switch fall-through In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I placed the "fall through" annotation at the bottom of the case, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1369529 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/usb-fw.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/usb-fw.c b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/usb-fw.c index 502c346..529ebca 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/usb-fw.c +++ b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/usb-fw.c @@ -130,12 +130,12 @@ retry: dev_err(dev, "BM-CMD: too many stalls in " "URB; resetting device\n"); usb_queue_reset_device(i2400mu->usb_iface); - /* fallthrough */ } else { usb_clear_halt(i2400mu->usb_dev, pipe); msleep(10); /* give the device some time */ goto retry; } + /* fall through */ case -EINVAL: /* while removing driver */ case -ENODEV: /* dev disconnect ... */ case -ENOENT: /* just ignore it */ -- 2.7.4