From 8252b54d9f9a82b1a377f84963fd7d93e1c420d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Benjamin Otte Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 16:25:26 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] uh, maybe putting new signals before LAST_SIGNAL might help against memory corruption? Original commit message from CVS: uh, maybe putting new signals before LAST_SIGNAL might help against memory corruption? --- gst-libs/gst/play/play.old.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gst-libs/gst/play/play.old.c b/gst-libs/gst/play/play.old.c index a256a8f..c754d83 100644 --- a/gst-libs/gst/play/play.old.c +++ b/gst-libs/gst/play/play.old.c @@ -33,8 +33,9 @@ enum { HAVE_XID, HAVE_VIS_XID, HAVE_VIDEO_SIZE, - LAST_SIGNAL, PIPELINE_ERROR, + /* put additional signals before this comment */ + LAST_SIGNAL, }; /* this struct is used to decouple signals coming out of threaded pipelines */ -- 2.7.4