From 81b00670f2264554e4d928db479b1e903481f038 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:56:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Use QElapsedTimer instead of QTime to measure elapsed time

QElaspedTimer is a lot more efficient.

Change-Id: I66d9514108f800a45181d8960b01a5e7d3fa9e80
Reviewed-by: Qt Doc Bot <qt_docbot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@nokia.com>
---
 tests/auto/corelib/thread/qsemaphore/tst_qsemaphore.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/auto/corelib/thread/qsemaphore/tst_qsemaphore.cpp b/tests/auto/corelib/thread/qsemaphore/tst_qsemaphore.cpp
index 597178f..a9de9c3 100644
--- a/tests/auto/corelib/thread/qsemaphore/tst_qsemaphore.cpp
+++ b/tests/auto/corelib/thread/qsemaphore/tst_qsemaphore.cpp
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ void tst_QSemaphore::tryAcquireWithTimeout()
     int fuzz = 50;
 
     QSemaphore semaphore;
-    QTime time;
+    QElapsedTimer time;
 
 #define FUZZYCOMPARE(a,e) \
     do { \
-- 
2.7.4