From 80924e5f7dbe00d964b7249160c7ca25fa3cd889 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vitaliy Gusev Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:17:43 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] tun: use tun_sk instead container_of Using macro tun_sk is more clear and shorter. However tun.c has tun_sk, but doesn't use it. Signed-off-by: Vitaliy Gusev Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- drivers/net/tun.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c index 01e99f2..2834a01 100644 --- a/drivers/net/tun.c +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c @@ -849,13 +849,13 @@ static void tun_sock_write_space(struct sock *sk) if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) wake_up_interruptible_sync(sk->sk_sleep); - tun = container_of(sk, struct tun_sock, sk)->tun; + tun = tun_sk(sk)->tun; kill_fasync(&tun->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_OUT); } static void tun_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk) { - free_netdev(container_of(sk, struct tun_sock, sk)->tun->dev); + free_netdev(tun_sk(sk)->tun->dev); } static struct proto tun_proto = { @@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ static int tun_set_iff(struct net *net, struct file *file, struct ifreq *ifr) sk->sk_write_space = tun_sock_write_space; sk->sk_sndbuf = INT_MAX; - container_of(sk, struct tun_sock, sk)->tun = tun; + tun_sk(sk)->tun = tun; security_tun_dev_post_create(sk); -- 2.7.4