From 7ef90146a14c2bb1de2e22399f147ebec5b74f0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: NeilBrown Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:40:51 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] Don't unconditionally set in_sync on newly added device in raid5_reshape When a reshape finds that it can add spare devices into the array, those devices might already be 'in_sync' if they are beyond the old size of the array, or they might not if they are within the array. The first case happens when we change an N-drive RAID5 to an N+1-drive RAID5. The second happens when we convert an N-drive RAID5 to an N+1-drive RAID6. So set the flag more carefully. Also, ->recovery_offset is only meaningful when the flag is clear, so only set it in that case. This change needs the preceding two to ensure that the non-in_sync device doesn't get evicted from the array when it is stopped, in the case where v0.90 metadata is used. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown --- drivers/md/raid5.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c index dcce204..ab40529 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c @@ -5361,9 +5361,11 @@ static int raid5_start_reshape(mddev_t *mddev) !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags)) { if (raid5_add_disk(mddev, rdev) == 0) { char nm[20]; - set_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags); + if (rdev->raid_disk >= conf->previous_raid_disks) + set_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags); + else + rdev->recovery_offset = 0; added_devices++; - rdev->recovery_offset = 0; sprintf(nm, "rd%d", rdev->raid_disk); if (sysfs_create_link(&mddev->kobj, &rdev->kobj, nm)) -- 2.7.4