From 7e154cdca71d694388e7773638243245b7450b81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 14:00:54 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Replace a nested namespace used for overload resolution with
 a struct. Richard Smith says that using the namespace results in an ODR
 violation, but I disagree. Nevertheless, the struct works just as well.

llvm-svn: 302800
---
 libcxx/include/memory | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libcxx/include/memory b/libcxx/include/memory
index bb1b415..4201c92 100644
--- a/libcxx/include/memory
+++ b/libcxx/include/memory
@@ -996,11 +996,11 @@ struct __rebind_pointer {
 
 // allocator_traits
 
-namespace __has_pointer_type_imp
+struct __has_pointer_type_imp
 {
     template <class _Up> static __two __test(...);
     template <class _Up> static char __test(typename _Up::pointer* = 0);
-}
+};
 
 template <class _Tp>
 struct __has_pointer_type
-- 
2.7.4