From 7e0dac2807e6c4ae8c56941d74971fdb0763b4f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joanne Koong Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 07:49:45 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Refactor process_dynptr_func This change cleans up process_dynptr_func's flow to be more intuitive and updates some comments with more context. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-3-joannelkoong@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 3 --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h index cf1bb1c..b26ff2a 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h @@ -616,9 +616,6 @@ int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, enum bpf_arg_type arg_type); int check_mem_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg, u32 regno, u32 mem_size); -struct bpf_call_arg_meta; -int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, - enum bpf_arg_type arg_type, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta); /* this lives here instead of in bpf.h because it needs to dereference tgt_prog */ static inline u64 bpf_trampoline_compute_key(const struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog, diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 5cb8b62..e0e0050 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -959,39 +959,49 @@ static int destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return 0; } -static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg, - int spi) +static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { + int spi; + if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) return false; - /* For -ERANGE (i.e. spi not falling into allocated stack slots), we - * will do check_mem_access to check and update stack bounds later, so - * return true for that case. + spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); + + /* -ERANGE (i.e. spi not falling into allocated stack slots) isn't an + * error because this just means the stack state hasn't been updated yet. + * We will do check_mem_access to check and update stack bounds later. */ - if (spi < 0) - return spi == -ERANGE; - /* We allow overwriting existing unreferenced STACK_DYNPTR slots, see - * mark_stack_slots_dynptr which calls destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot to - * ensure dynptr objects at the slots we are touching are completely - * destructed before we reinitialize them for a new one. For referenced - * ones, destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot returns an error early instead of - * delaying it until the end where the user will get "Unreleased + if (spi < 0 && spi != -ERANGE) + return false; + + /* We don't need to check if the stack slots are marked by previous + * dynptr initializations because we allow overwriting existing unreferenced + * STACK_DYNPTR slots, see mark_stack_slots_dynptr which calls + * destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot to ensure dynptr objects at the slots we are + * touching are completely destructed before we reinitialize them for a new + * one. For referenced ones, destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot returns an error early + * instead of delaying it until the end where the user will get "Unreleased * reference" error. */ return true; } -static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg, - int spi) +static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg); - int i; + int i, spi; - /* This already represents first slot of initialized bpf_dynptr */ + /* This already represents first slot of initialized bpf_dynptr. + * + * CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR already has fixed and var_off as 0 due to + * check_func_arg_reg_off's logic, so we don't need to check its + * offset and alignment. + */ if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) return true; + spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); if (spi < 0) return false; if (!state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.first_slot) @@ -6215,11 +6225,10 @@ static int process_kptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, * Helpers which do not mutate the bpf_dynptr set MEM_RDONLY in their argument * type, and declare it as 'const struct bpf_dynptr *' in their prototype. */ -int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, - enum bpf_arg_type arg_type, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta) +static int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, + enum bpf_arg_type arg_type, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta) { struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *reg = ®s[regno]; - int spi = 0; /* MEM_UNINIT and MEM_RDONLY are exclusive, when applied to an * ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR (or ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | DYNPTR_TYPE_*): @@ -6228,15 +6237,6 @@ int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, verbose(env, "verifier internal error: misconfigured dynptr helper type flags\n"); return -EFAULT; } - /* CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR already has fixed and var_off as 0 due to - * check_func_arg_reg_off's logic. We only need to check offset - * and its alignment for PTR_TO_STACK. - */ - if (reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) { - spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); - if (spi < 0 && spi != -ERANGE) - return spi; - } /* MEM_UNINIT - Points to memory that is an appropriate candidate for * constructing a mutable bpf_dynptr object. @@ -6254,7 +6254,7 @@ int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, * to. */ if (arg_type & MEM_UNINIT) { - if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(env, reg, spi)) { + if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(env, reg)) { verbose(env, "Dynptr has to be an uninitialized dynptr\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -6277,7 +6277,7 @@ int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, return -EINVAL; } - if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(env, reg, spi)) { + if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(env, reg)) { verbose(env, "Expected an initialized dynptr as arg #%d\n", regno); -- 2.7.4