From 7863c054d1b4fd35f76c13e2e918f7f483fe48f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Veaceslav Falico Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:20:06 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] net: use lists as arguments instead of bool upper Currently we make use of bool upper when we want to specify if we want to work with upper/lower list. It's, however, harder to read, debug and occupies a lot more code. Fix this by just passing the correct upper/lower_dev_list list_head pointer instead of bool upper, and work internally with it. CC: "David S. Miller" CC: Eric Dumazet CC: Jiri Pirko CC: Alexander Duyck CC: Cong Wang Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/core/dev.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c index 5c713f2..9be7937 100644 --- a/net/core/dev.c +++ b/net/core/dev.c @@ -4385,12 +4385,9 @@ struct netdev_adjacent { static struct netdev_adjacent *__netdev_find_adj(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *adj_dev, - bool upper) + struct list_head *dev_list) { struct netdev_adjacent *adj; - struct list_head *dev_list; - - dev_list = upper ? &dev->upper_dev_list : &dev->lower_dev_list; list_for_each_entry(adj, dev_list, list) { if (adj->dev == adj_dev) @@ -4402,13 +4399,13 @@ static struct netdev_adjacent *__netdev_find_adj(struct net_device *dev, static inline struct netdev_adjacent *__netdev_find_upper(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *udev) { - return __netdev_find_adj(dev, udev, true); + return __netdev_find_adj(dev, udev, &dev->upper_dev_list); } static inline struct netdev_adjacent *__netdev_find_lower(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *ldev) { - return __netdev_find_adj(dev, ldev, false); + return __netdev_find_adj(dev, ldev, &dev->lower_dev_list); } /** @@ -4514,12 +4511,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu); static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *adj_dev, - bool neighbour, bool master, - bool upper) + struct list_head *dev_list, + bool neighbour, bool master) { struct netdev_adjacent *adj; - adj = __netdev_find_adj(dev, adj_dev, upper); + adj = __netdev_find_adj(dev, adj_dev, dev_list); if (adj) { BUG_ON(neighbour); @@ -4538,19 +4535,14 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev, dev_hold(adj_dev); pr_debug("dev_hold for %s, because of %s link added from %s to %s\n", - adj_dev->name, upper ? "upper" : "lower", dev->name, - adj_dev->name); + adj_dev->name, dev_list == &dev->upper_dev_list ? + "upper" : "lower", dev->name, adj_dev->name); - if (!upper) { - list_add_tail_rcu(&adj->list, &dev->lower_dev_list); - return 0; - } - - /* Ensure that master upper link is always the first item in list. */ + /* Ensure that master link is always the first item in list. */ if (master) - list_add_rcu(&adj->list, &dev->upper_dev_list); + list_add_rcu(&adj->list, dev_list); else - list_add_tail_rcu(&adj->list, &dev->upper_dev_list); + list_add_tail_rcu(&adj->list, dev_list); return 0; } @@ -4559,27 +4551,25 @@ static inline int __netdev_upper_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *udev, bool master, bool neighbour) { - return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, udev, neighbour, master, - true); + return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, udev, &dev->upper_dev_list, + neighbour, master); } static inline int __netdev_lower_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *ldev, bool neighbour) { - return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, ldev, neighbour, false, - false); + return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, ldev, &dev->lower_dev_list, + neighbour, false); } void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev, - struct net_device *adj_dev, bool upper) + struct net_device *adj_dev, + struct list_head *dev_list) { struct netdev_adjacent *adj; - if (upper) - adj = __netdev_find_upper(dev, adj_dev); - else - adj = __netdev_find_lower(dev, adj_dev); + adj = __netdev_find_adj(dev, adj_dev, dev_list); if (!adj) BUG(); @@ -4591,8 +4581,8 @@ void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev, list_del_rcu(&adj->list); pr_debug("dev_put for %s, because of %s link removed from %s to %s\n", - adj_dev->name, upper ? "upper" : "lower", dev->name, - adj_dev->name); + adj_dev->name, dev_list == &dev->upper_dev_list ? + "upper" : "lower", dev->name, adj_dev->name); dev_put(adj_dev); kfree_rcu(adj, rcu); } @@ -4600,13 +4590,13 @@ void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev, static inline void __netdev_upper_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *udev) { - return __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, udev, true); + return __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, udev, &dev->upper_dev_list); } static inline void __netdev_lower_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *ldev) { - return __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, ldev, false); + return __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, ldev, &dev->lower_dev_list); } int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(struct net_device *dev, -- 2.7.4