From 75100ec5f079c5c3c65b28a6b8d360acfe00b983 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexander Shishkin Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 14:07:55 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] perf/core: Fix exclusive events' grouping commit 8a58ddae23796c733c5dfbd717538d89d036c5bd upstream. So far, we tried to disallow grouping exclusive events for the fear of complications they would cause with moving between contexts. Specifically, moving a software group to a hardware context would violate the exclusivity rules if both groups contain matching exclusive events. This attempt was, however, unsuccessful: the check that we have in the perf_event_open() syscall is both wrong (looks at wrong PMU) and insufficient (group leader may still be exclusive), as can be illustrated by running: $ perf record -e '{intel_pt//,cycles}' uname $ perf record -e '{cycles,intel_pt//}' uname ultimately successfully. Furthermore, we are completely free to trigger the exclusivity violation by: perf -e '{cycles,intel_pt//}' -e '{intel_pt//,instructions}' even though the helpful perf record will not allow that, the ABI will. The warning later in the perf_event_open() path will also not trigger, because it's also wrong. Fix all this by validating the original group before moving, getting rid of broken safeguards and placing a useful one to perf_install_in_context(). Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vince Weaver Cc: mathieu.poirier@linaro.org Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Fixes: bed5b25ad9c8a ("perf: Add a pmu capability for "exclusive" events") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190701110755.24646-1-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- include/linux/perf_event.h | 5 +++++ kernel/events/core.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h index 42fc852..b22bc81 100644 --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h @@ -1030,6 +1030,11 @@ static inline int in_software_context(struct perf_event *event) return event->ctx->pmu->task_ctx_nr == perf_sw_context; } +static inline int is_exclusive_pmu(struct pmu *pmu) +{ + return pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE; +} + extern struct static_key perf_swevent_enabled[PERF_COUNT_SW_MAX]; extern void ___perf_sw_event(u32, u64, struct pt_regs *, u64); diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index 3b61ff4..6fb9c60 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -2541,6 +2541,9 @@ unlock: return ret; } +static bool exclusive_event_installable(struct perf_event *event, + struct perf_event_context *ctx); + /* * Attach a performance event to a context. * @@ -2555,6 +2558,8 @@ perf_install_in_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx, lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->mutex); + WARN_ON_ONCE(!exclusive_event_installable(event, ctx)); + if (event->cpu != -1) event->cpu = cpu; @@ -4341,7 +4346,7 @@ static int exclusive_event_init(struct perf_event *event) { struct pmu *pmu = event->pmu; - if (!(pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE)) + if (!is_exclusive_pmu(pmu)) return 0; /* @@ -4372,7 +4377,7 @@ static void exclusive_event_destroy(struct perf_event *event) { struct pmu *pmu = event->pmu; - if (!(pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE)) + if (!is_exclusive_pmu(pmu)) return; /* see comment in exclusive_event_init() */ @@ -4392,14 +4397,15 @@ static bool exclusive_event_match(struct perf_event *e1, struct perf_event *e2) return false; } -/* Called under the same ctx::mutex as perf_install_in_context() */ static bool exclusive_event_installable(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx) { struct perf_event *iter_event; struct pmu *pmu = event->pmu; - if (!(pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE)) + lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->mutex); + + if (!is_exclusive_pmu(pmu)) return true; list_for_each_entry(iter_event, &ctx->event_list, event_entry) { @@ -10613,11 +10619,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open, goto err_alloc; } - if ((pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE) && group_leader) { - err = -EBUSY; - goto err_context; - } - /* * Look up the group leader (we will attach this event to it): */ @@ -10705,6 +10706,18 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open, move_group = 0; } } + + /* + * Failure to create exclusive events returns -EBUSY. + */ + err = -EBUSY; + if (!exclusive_event_installable(group_leader, ctx)) + goto err_locked; + + for_each_sibling_event(sibling, group_leader) { + if (!exclusive_event_installable(sibling, ctx)) + goto err_locked; + } } else { mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex); } @@ -10741,9 +10754,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open, * because we need to serialize with concurrent event creation. */ if (!exclusive_event_installable(event, ctx)) { - /* exclusive and group stuff are assumed mutually exclusive */ - WARN_ON_ONCE(move_group); - err = -EBUSY; goto err_locked; } -- 2.7.4