From 725026ed593f1b6da66fe7e3777cd891dbf7343f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:27:44 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: abort transaction at balance_level() when left child is missing At balance_level() we are calling btrfs_handle_fs_error() when the middle child only has 1 item and the left child is missing, however we can simply use btrfs_abort_transaction(), which achieves the same purposes: to turn the fs to error state, abort the current transaction and turn the fs to RO mode. Besides that, btrfs_abort_transaction() also prints a stack trace which makes it more useful. Also, as this is a highly unexpected case and it's about a b+tree inconsistency, change the error code from -EROFS to -EUCLEAN, tag the if branch as 'unlikely' and log an explicit error message. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c index 4dcdcf2..00eea292 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c @@ -1164,9 +1164,13 @@ static noinline int balance_level(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, * otherwise we would have pulled some pointers from the * right */ - if (!left) { - ret = -EROFS; - btrfs_handle_fs_error(fs_info, ret, NULL); + if (unlikely(!left)) { + btrfs_crit(fs_info, +"missing left child when middle child only has 1 item, parent bytenr %llu level %d mid bytenr %llu root %llu", + parent->start, btrfs_header_level(parent), + mid->start, btrfs_root_id(root)); + ret = -EUCLEAN; + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); goto out; } wret = balance_node_right(trans, mid, left); -- 2.7.4