From 7066f0f933a1fd707bb38781866657769cff7efc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrea Arcangeli Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:10:40 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mm: thp: fix mmu_notifier in migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page() change_huge_pmd() after arming the numa/protnone pmd doesn't flush the TLB right away. do_huge_pmd_numa_page() flushes the TLB before calling migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page(). By the time do_huge_pmd_numa_page() runs some CPU could still access the page through the TLB. change_huge_pmd() before arming the numa/protnone transhuge pmd calls mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(). So there's no need of mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start()/mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_only_end() sequence in migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page() too, because by the time migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page() runs, the pmd mapping has already been invalidated in the secondary MMUs. It has to or if a secondary MMU can still write to the page, the migrate_page_copy() would lose data. However an explicit mmu_notifier_invalidate_range() is needed before migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page() starts copying the data of the transhuge page or the below can happen for MMU notifier users sharing the primary MMU pagetables and only implementing ->invalidate_range: CPU0 CPU1 GPU sharing linux pagetables using only ->invalidate_range ----------- ------------ --------- GPU secondary MMU writes to the page mapped by the transhuge pmd change_pmd_range() mmu..._range_start() ->invalidate_range_start() noop change_huge_pmd() set_pmd_at(numa/protnone) pmd_unlock() do_huge_pmd_numa_page() CPU TLB flush globally (1) CPU cannot write to page migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page() GPU writes to the page... migrate_page_copy() ...GPU stops writing to the page CPU TLB flush (2) mmu..._range_end() (3) ->invalidate_range_stop() noop ->invalidate_range() GPU secondary MMU is invalidated and cannot write to the page anymore (too late) Just like we need a CPU TLB flush (1) because the TLB flush (2) arrives too late, we also need a mmu_notifier_invalidate_range() before calling migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page(), because the ->invalidate_range() in (3) also arrives too late. This requirement is the result of the lazy optimization in change_huge_pmd() that releases the pmd_lock without first flushing the TLB and without first calling mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(). Even converting the removed mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_only_end() into a mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end() would not have been enough to fix this, because it run after migrate_page_copy(). After the hugepage data copy is done migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page() can proceed and call set_pmd_at without having to flush the TLB nor any secondary MMUs because the secondary MMU invalidate, just like the CPU TLB flush, has to happen before the migrate_page_copy() is called or it would be a bug in the first place (and it was for drivers using ->invalidate_range()). KVM is unaffected because it doesn't implement ->invalidate_range(). The standard PAGE_SIZEd migrate_misplaced_page is less accelerated and uses the generic migrate_pages which transitions the pte from numa/protnone to a migration entry in try_to_unmap_one() and flushes TLBs and all mmu notifiers there before copying the page. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181013002430.698-3-aarcange@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli Acked-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Reviewed-by: Aaron Tomlin Cc: Jerome Glisse Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- mm/huge_memory.c | 14 +++++++++++++- mm/migrate.c | 19 ++++++------------- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c index 25c7d75..25ef59b 100644 --- a/mm/huge_memory.c +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -1558,8 +1558,20 @@ vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf, pmd_t pmd) * We are not sure a pending tlb flush here is for a huge page * mapping or not. Hence use the tlb range variant */ - if (mm_tlb_flush_pending(vma->vm_mm)) + if (mm_tlb_flush_pending(vma->vm_mm)) { flush_tlb_range(vma, haddr, haddr + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE); + /* + * change_huge_pmd() released the pmd lock before + * invalidating the secondary MMUs sharing the primary + * MMU pagetables (with ->invalidate_range()). The + * mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end() (which + * internally calls ->invalidate_range()) in + * change_pmd_range() will run after us, so we can't + * rely on it here and we need an explicit invalidate. + */ + mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(vma->vm_mm, haddr, + haddr + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE); + } /* * Migrate the THP to the requested node, returns with page unlocked diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c index 93d9a1e..905c226 100644 --- a/mm/migrate.c +++ b/mm/migrate.c @@ -1975,8 +1975,8 @@ int migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, int isolated = 0; struct page *new_page = NULL; int page_lru = page_is_file_cache(page); - unsigned long mmun_start = address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK; - unsigned long mmun_end = mmun_start + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE; + unsigned long start = address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK; + unsigned long end = start + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE; new_page = alloc_pages_node(node, (GFP_TRANSHUGE_LIGHT | __GFP_THISNODE), @@ -2003,11 +2003,9 @@ int migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, WARN_ON(PageLRU(new_page)); /* Recheck the target PMD */ - mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(mm, mmun_start, mmun_end); ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd); if (unlikely(!pmd_same(*pmd, entry) || !page_ref_freeze(page, 2))) { spin_unlock(ptl); - mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(mm, mmun_start, mmun_end); /* Reverse changes made by migrate_page_copy() */ if (TestClearPageActive(new_page)) @@ -2038,8 +2036,8 @@ int migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, * new page and page_add_new_anon_rmap guarantee the copy is * visible before the pagetable update. */ - flush_cache_range(vma, mmun_start, mmun_end); - page_add_anon_rmap(new_page, vma, mmun_start, true); + flush_cache_range(vma, start, end); + page_add_anon_rmap(new_page, vma, start, true); /* * At this point the pmd is numa/protnone (i.e. non present) and the TLB * has already been flushed globally. So no TLB can be currently @@ -2051,7 +2049,7 @@ int migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, * MADV_DONTNEED won't wait on the pmd lock and it'll skip clearing this * pmd. */ - set_pmd_at(mm, mmun_start, pmd, entry); + set_pmd_at(mm, start, pmd, entry); update_mmu_cache_pmd(vma, address, &entry); page_ref_unfreeze(page, 2); @@ -2060,11 +2058,6 @@ int migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, set_page_owner_migrate_reason(new_page, MR_NUMA_MISPLACED); spin_unlock(ptl); - /* - * No need to double call mmu_notifier->invalidate_range() callback as - * the above pmdp_huge_clear_flush_notify() did already call it. - */ - mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(mm, mmun_start, mmun_end); /* Take an "isolate" reference and put new page on the LRU. */ get_page(new_page); @@ -2088,7 +2081,7 @@ out_fail: ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd); if (pmd_same(*pmd, entry)) { entry = pmd_modify(entry, vma->vm_page_prot); - set_pmd_at(mm, mmun_start, pmd, entry); + set_pmd_at(mm, start, pmd, entry); update_mmu_cache_pmd(vma, address, &entry); } spin_unlock(ptl); -- 2.7.4