From 705d201414382b0966d7c903d738dfdb9380e4af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 16:21:01 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] libata: add missing NULL pointer check to ata_eh_reset() drivers/ata/libata-eh.c +2403 ata_eh_reset(80) warning: variable derefenced before check 'slave' Please note that this is _not_ a real bug at the moment since ata_eh_context structure is embedded into ata_list structure and the code alwas checks for 'slave' before accessing 'sehc'. Anyway lets add missing check and always have a valid 'sehc' pointer (which makes code easier to understand and prevents introducing some possible bugs in the future). Reported-by: Dan Carpenter Cc: corbet@lwn.net Cc: eteo@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c index 1a07c06..79711b6 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c @@ -2327,7 +2327,7 @@ int ata_eh_reset(struct ata_link *link, int classify, struct ata_port *ap = link->ap; struct ata_link *slave = ap->slave_link; struct ata_eh_context *ehc = &link->eh_context; - struct ata_eh_context *sehc = &slave->eh_context; + struct ata_eh_context *sehc = slave ? &slave->eh_context : NULL; unsigned int *classes = ehc->classes; unsigned int lflags = link->flags; int verbose = !(ehc->i.flags & ATA_EHI_QUIET); -- 2.7.4