From 6c132b5fe6579ed4b4892c02fe6c05f7e3afc579 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: john stultz Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:45:36 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] x86-64: Fix bad assumption that dualcore cpus have synced TSCs This should resolve the issue seen in bugme bug #5105, where it is assumed that dualcore x86_64 systems have synced TSCs. This is not the case, and alternate timesources should be used instead. For more details, see: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5105 Andi's earlier concerns that the TSCs should be synced on dualcore systems have been resolved by confirmation from AMD folks that they can be unsynced. Acked-by: Andi Kleen Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c index 2373cb8..703acde 100644 --- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c +++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c @@ -959,9 +959,6 @@ static __init int unsynchronized_tsc(void) are handled in the OEM check above. */ if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL) return 0; - /* All in a single socket - should be synchronized */ - if (cpus_weight(cpu_core_map[0]) == num_online_cpus()) - return 0; #endif /* Assume multi socket systems are not synchronized */ return num_online_cpus() > 1; -- 2.7.4