From 6bfbf4d0aa0c5ebfd4442e1200b21565703e90ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Ujfalusi Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 15:55:45 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] spi: img-spfi: Use dma_request_chan() instead dma_request_slave_channel() dma_request_slave_channel() is a wrapper on top of dma_request_chan() eating up the error code. By using dma_request_chan() directly the driver can support deferred probing against DMA. Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191212135550.4634-5-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/spi/spi-img-spfi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-img-spfi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-img-spfi.c index f4a8f47..8543f5e 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-img-spfi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-img-spfi.c @@ -666,8 +666,22 @@ static int img_spfi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) master->unprepare_message = img_spfi_unprepare; master->handle_err = img_spfi_handle_err; - spfi->tx_ch = dma_request_slave_channel(spfi->dev, "tx"); - spfi->rx_ch = dma_request_slave_channel(spfi->dev, "rx"); + spfi->tx_ch = dma_request_chan(spfi->dev, "tx"); + if (IS_ERR(spfi->tx_ch)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(spfi->tx_ch); + spfi->tx_ch = NULL; + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) + goto disable_pm; + } + + spfi->rx_ch = dma_request_chan(spfi->dev, "rx"); + if (IS_ERR(spfi->rx_ch)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(spfi->rx_ch); + spfi->rx_ch = NULL; + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) + goto disable_pm; + } + if (!spfi->tx_ch || !spfi->rx_ch) { if (spfi->tx_ch) dma_release_channel(spfi->tx_ch); -- 2.7.4