From 69cdb7947adb816fc9325b4ec02a6dddd5070b82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Junlin Yang Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 16:48:39 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ibmvnic: remove excessive irqsave ibmvnic_remove locks multiple spinlocks while disabling interrupts: spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->state_lock, flags); spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->rwi_lock, flags); As reported by coccinelle, the second _irqsave() overwrites the value saved in 'flags' by the first _irqsave(), therefore when the second _irqrestore() comes,the value in 'flags' is not valid,the value saved by the first _irqsave() has been lost. This likely leads to IRQs remaining disabled. So remove the second _irqsave(): spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->state_lock, flags); spin_lock(&adapter->rwi_lock); Generated by: ./scripts/coccinelle/locks/flags.cocci ./drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c:5413:1-18: ERROR: nested lock+irqsave that reuses flags from line 5404. Fixes: 4a41c421f367 ("ibmvnic: serialize access to work queue on remove") Signed-off-by: Junlin Yang Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c index b6102cc..161fa95 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c @@ -5408,9 +5408,9 @@ static int ibmvnic_remove(struct vio_dev *dev) * after setting state, so __ibmvnic_reset() which is called * from the flush_work() below, can make progress. */ - spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->rwi_lock, flags); + spin_lock(&adapter->rwi_lock); adapter->state = VNIC_REMOVING; - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->rwi_lock, flags); + spin_unlock(&adapter->rwi_lock); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->state_lock, flags); -- 2.7.4