From 6924d70fd41c562375a6330d21d705953a89b7da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: tobi Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 20:35:58 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] * gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/name_clash2.f90: Remove outdated comment. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@84395 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 --- gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/name_clash.f90 | 1 - 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index a821acb..601892e 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,4 +1,9 @@ 2004-07-09 Tobias Schlueter + + * gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/name_clash2.f90: Remove outdated + comment. + +2004-07-09 Tobias Schlueter Paul Brook * gfortran.dg/dg.exp: Use revised wilcard for suffixes, also allow diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/name_clash.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/name_clash.f90 index 7386002..7b8c0c7 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/name_clash.f90 +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/name_clash.f90 @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ ! This is the testcase from PR13249. ! the two different entities named AN_EXAMPLE shouldn't conflict -! the real bug is PR15481, we currently (2004/06/09) work around PR13249 MODULE MOD INTEGER FOO END -- 2.7.4