From 65d6ec10c7cf2575de2aa9159f8cf43cbc1074fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:14:39 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] cgroup: use a dedicated workqueue for cgroup destruction commit e5fca243abae1445afbfceebda5f08462ef869d3 upstream. Since be44562613851 ("cgroup: remove synchronize_rcu() from cgroup_diput()"), cgroup destruction path makes use of workqueue. css freeing is performed from a work item from that point on and a later commit, ea15f8ccdb430 ("cgroup: split cgroup destruction into two steps"), moves css offlining to workqueue too. As cgroup destruction isn't depended upon for memory reclaim, the destruction work items were put on the system_wq; unfortunately, some controller may block in the destruction path for considerable duration while holding cgroup_mutex. As large part of destruction path is synchronized through cgroup_mutex, when combined with high rate of cgroup removals, this has potential to fill up system_wq's max_active of 256. Also, it turns out that memcg's css destruction path ends up queueing and waiting for work items on system_wq through work_on_cpu(). If such operation happens while system_wq is fully occupied by cgroup destruction work items, work_on_cpu() can't make forward progress because system_wq is full and other destruction work items on system_wq can't make forward progress because the work item waiting for work_on_cpu() is holding cgroup_mutex, leading to deadlock. This can be fixed by queueing destruction work items on a separate workqueue. This patch creates a dedicated workqueue - cgroup_destroy_wq - for this purpose. As these work items shouldn't have inter-dependencies and mostly serialized by cgroup_mutex anyway, giving high concurrency level doesn't buy anything and the workqueue's @max_active is set to 1 so that destruction work items are executed one by one on each CPU. Hugh Dickins: Because cgroup_init() is run before init_workqueues(), cgroup_destroy_wq can't be allocated from cgroup_init(). Do it from a separate core_initcall(). In the future, we probably want to reorder so that workqueue init happens before cgroup_init(). Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Reported-by: Hugh Dickins Reported-by: Shawn Bohrer Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20131111220626.GA7509@sbohrermbp13-local.rgmadvisors.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/g/alpine.LNX.2.00.1310301606080.2333@eggly.anvils Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/cgroup.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c index 8bd9cfd..c422bc5 100644 --- a/kernel/cgroup.c +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c @@ -90,6 +90,14 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(cgroup_mutex); static DEFINE_MUTEX(cgroup_root_mutex); /* + * cgroup destruction makes heavy use of work items and there can be a lot + * of concurrent destructions. Use a separate workqueue so that cgroup + * destruction work items don't end up filling up max_active of system_wq + * which may lead to deadlock. + */ +static struct workqueue_struct *cgroup_destroy_wq; + +/* * Generate an array of cgroup subsystem pointers. At boot time, this is * populated with the built in subsystems, and modular subsystems are * registered after that. The mutable section of this array is protected by @@ -908,7 +916,7 @@ static void cgroup_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) struct cgroup *cgrp = container_of(head, struct cgroup, rcu_head); INIT_WORK(&cgrp->destroy_work, cgroup_free_fn); - schedule_work(&cgrp->destroy_work); + queue_work(cgroup_destroy_wq, &cgrp->destroy_work); } static void cgroup_diput(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode) @@ -4306,7 +4314,7 @@ static void css_free_rcu_fn(struct rcu_head *rcu_head) * css_put(). dput() requires process context which we don't have. */ INIT_WORK(&css->destroy_work, css_free_work_fn); - schedule_work(&css->destroy_work); + queue_work(cgroup_destroy_wq, &css->destroy_work); } static void css_release(struct percpu_ref *ref) @@ -4603,7 +4611,7 @@ static void css_killed_ref_fn(struct percpu_ref *ref) container_of(ref, struct cgroup_subsys_state, refcnt); INIT_WORK(&css->destroy_work, css_killed_work_fn); - schedule_work(&css->destroy_work); + queue_work(cgroup_destroy_wq, &css->destroy_work); } /** @@ -5139,6 +5147,22 @@ out: return err; } +static int __init cgroup_wq_init(void) +{ + /* + * There isn't much point in executing destruction path in + * parallel. Good chunk is serialized with cgroup_mutex anyway. + * Use 1 for @max_active. + * + * We would prefer to do this in cgroup_init() above, but that + * is called before init_workqueues(): so leave this until after. + */ + cgroup_destroy_wq = alloc_workqueue("cgroup_destroy", 0, 1); + BUG_ON(!cgroup_destroy_wq); + return 0; +} +core_initcall(cgroup_wq_init); + /* * proc_cgroup_show() * - Print task's cgroup paths into seq_file, one line for each hierarchy -- 2.7.4