From 631003e2333c12cc1b52df06a707365b7363a159 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Naohiro Aota Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 17:45:24 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: zoned: fix wrong use of bitops API in btrfs_ensure_empty_zones find_next_bit and find_next_zero_bit take @size as the second parameter and @offset as the third parameter. They are specified opposite in btrfs_ensure_empty_zones(). Thanks to the later loop, it never failed to detect the empty zones. Fix them and (maybe) return the result a bit faster. Note: the naming is a bit confusing, size has two meanings here, bitmap and our range size. Fixes: 1cd6121f2a38 ("btrfs: zoned: implement zoned chunk allocator") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/zoned.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c index a9b32ba..d510576 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c @@ -1168,12 +1168,12 @@ int btrfs_ensure_empty_zones(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 start, u64 size) return -ERANGE; /* All the zones are conventional */ - if (find_next_bit(zinfo->seq_zones, begin, end) == end) + if (find_next_bit(zinfo->seq_zones, end, begin) == end) return 0; /* All the zones are sequential and empty */ - if (find_next_zero_bit(zinfo->seq_zones, begin, end) == end && - find_next_zero_bit(zinfo->empty_zones, begin, end) == end) + if (find_next_zero_bit(zinfo->seq_zones, end, begin) == end && + find_next_zero_bit(zinfo->empty_zones, end, begin) == end) return 0; for (pos = start; pos < start + size; pos += zinfo->zone_size) { -- 2.7.4