From 62c7139f3ed011379fbbef832b4b15e3c10b355f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hans Wippel Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 15:56:17 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] net/smc: unlock LGR pending lock earlier for SMC-D If SMC client and server connections are both established at the same time, smc_connect_ism() cannot send a CLC confirm message while smc_listen_work() is waiting for one due to lock contention. This can result in timeouts in smc_clc_wait_msg() and failed SMC connections. In case of SMC-D, the LGR pending lock is not needed while smc_listen_work() is waiting for the CLC confirm message. So, this patch releases the lock earlier for SMC-D to avoid the locking issue. Signed-off-by: Hans Wippel Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/smc/af_smc.c | 14 +++++++++----- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c index 60ccc8f50368..cf49ed05007b 100644 --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c @@ -1287,24 +1287,28 @@ static void smc_listen_work(struct work_struct *work) return; } + /* SMC-D does not need this lock any more */ + if (ism_supported) + mutex_unlock(&smc_create_lgr_pending); + /* receive SMC Confirm CLC message */ reason_code = smc_clc_wait_msg(new_smc, &cclc, sizeof(cclc), SMC_CLC_CONFIRM, CLC_WAIT_TIME); if (reason_code) { - mutex_unlock(&smc_create_lgr_pending); + if (!ism_supported) + mutex_unlock(&smc_create_lgr_pending); smc_listen_decline(new_smc, reason_code, local_contact); return; } /* finish worker */ if (!ism_supported) { - if (smc_listen_rdma_finish(new_smc, &cclc, local_contact)) { - mutex_unlock(&smc_create_lgr_pending); + rc = smc_listen_rdma_finish(new_smc, &cclc, local_contact); + mutex_unlock(&smc_create_lgr_pending); + if (rc) return; - } } smc_conn_save_peer_info(new_smc, &cclc); - mutex_unlock(&smc_create_lgr_pending); smc_listen_out_connected(new_smc); } -- 2.34.1