From 62b2fbb9c463c2b9c4332d1ce586273500cc0148 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ulf Hansson Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 18:14:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] mmc: via-sdmmc: Respect the cmd->busy_timeout from the mmc core [ Upstream commit 966244ccd2919e28f25555a77f204cd1c109cad8 ] Using a fixed 1s timeout for all commands (and data transfers) is a bit problematic. For some commands it means waiting longer than needed for the timer to expire, which may not a big issue, but still. For other commands, like for an erase (CMD38) that uses a R1B response, may require longer timeouts than 1s. In these cases, we may end up treating the command as it failed, while it just needed some more time to complete successfully. Fix the problem by respecting the cmd->busy_timeout, which is provided by the mmc core. Cc: Bruce Chang Cc: Harald Welte Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200414161413.3036-17-ulf.hansson@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/mmc/host/via-sdmmc.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/via-sdmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/via-sdmmc.c index f4ac064..8d96ecb 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/via-sdmmc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/via-sdmmc.c @@ -319,6 +319,8 @@ struct via_crdr_mmc_host { /* some devices need a very long delay for power to stabilize */ #define VIA_CRDR_QUIRK_300MS_PWRDELAY 0x0001 +#define VIA_CMD_TIMEOUT_MS 1000 + static const struct pci_device_id via_ids[] = { {PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_9530, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0,}, @@ -551,14 +553,17 @@ static void via_sdc_send_command(struct via_crdr_mmc_host *host, { void __iomem *addrbase; struct mmc_data *data; + unsigned int timeout_ms; u32 cmdctrl = 0; WARN_ON(host->cmd); data = cmd->data; - mod_timer(&host->timer, jiffies + HZ); host->cmd = cmd; + timeout_ms = cmd->busy_timeout ? cmd->busy_timeout : VIA_CMD_TIMEOUT_MS; + mod_timer(&host->timer, jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms)); + /*Command index*/ cmdctrl = cmd->opcode << 8; -- 2.7.4