From 62acadda115a94bffd1f6b36acbb67e3f04811be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Atul Kumar Pant Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 02:15:53 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] audit: add space before parenthesis and around '=', "==", and '<' Fixes following checkpatch.pl issue: ERROR: space required before the open parenthesis '(' ERROR: spaces required around that '=' ERROR: spaces required around that '<' ERROR: spaces required around that '==' Signed-off-by: Atul Kumar Pant [PM: subject line tweaks] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore --- kernel/acct.c | 2 +- kernel/auditfilter.c | 16 ++++++++-------- kernel/auditsc.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/acct.c b/kernel/acct.c index 010667c..c95a935 100644 --- a/kernel/acct.c +++ b/kernel/acct.c @@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ static void fill_ac(acct_t *ac) do_div(elapsed, AHZ); btime = ktime_get_real_seconds() - elapsed; ac->ac_btime = clamp_t(time64_t, btime, 0, U32_MAX); -#if ACCT_VERSION==2 +#if ACCT_VERSION == 2 ac->ac_ahz = AHZ; #endif diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c index 42d9989..1232012 100644 --- a/kernel/auditfilter.c +++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static int audit_match_signal(struct audit_entry *entry) entry->rule.mask)); } - switch(audit_classify_arch(arch->val)) { + switch (audit_classify_arch(arch->val)) { case 0: /* native */ return (audit_match_class_bits(AUDIT_CLASS_SIGNAL, entry->rule.mask)); @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static inline struct audit_entry *audit_to_entry_common(struct audit_rule_data * err = -EINVAL; listnr = rule->flags & ~AUDIT_FILTER_PREPEND; - switch(listnr) { + switch (listnr) { default: goto exit_err; #ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static int audit_field_valid(struct audit_entry *entry, struct audit_field *f) switch (entry->rule.listnr) { case AUDIT_FILTER_FS: - switch(f->type) { + switch (f->type) { case AUDIT_FSTYPE: case AUDIT_FILTERKEY: break; @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ static struct audit_rule_data *audit_krule_to_data(struct audit_krule *krule) data->fields[i] = f->type; data->fieldflags[i] = audit_ops[f->op]; - switch(f->type) { + switch (f->type) { case AUDIT_SUBJ_USER: case AUDIT_SUBJ_ROLE: case AUDIT_SUBJ_TYPE: @@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ static int audit_compare_rule(struct audit_krule *a, struct audit_krule *b) a->fields[i].op != b->fields[i].op) return 1; - switch(a->fields[i].type) { + switch (a->fields[i].type) { case AUDIT_SUBJ_USER: case AUDIT_SUBJ_ROLE: case AUDIT_SUBJ_TYPE: @@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ static inline int audit_add_rule(struct audit_entry *entry) int dont_count = 0; /* If any of these, don't count towards total */ - switch(entry->rule.listnr) { + switch (entry->rule.listnr) { case AUDIT_FILTER_USER: case AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE: case AUDIT_FILTER_FS: @@ -1029,7 +1029,7 @@ int audit_del_rule(struct audit_entry *entry) int dont_count = 0; /* If any of these, don't count towards total */ - switch(entry->rule.listnr) { + switch (entry->rule.listnr) { case AUDIT_FILTER_USER: case AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE: case AUDIT_FILTER_FS: @@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@ static void audit_list_rules(int seq, struct sk_buff_head *q) /* This is a blocking read, so use audit_filter_mutex instead of rcu * iterator to sync with list writers. */ - for (i=0; ii_fsnotify_marks)) { -- 2.7.4