From 6292b4ba607de5bcf4ab0e57892a2f8068e6b997 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Luca Ceresoli Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 10:31:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] docs: i2c: i2c-topology: fix typo "intension" should have probably been "intention", however "intent" seems even better. Reported-by: Bagas Sanjaya Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli Acked-by: Peter Rosin Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang --- Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst b/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst index 7cb5381..c9ed3b4 100644 --- a/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst +++ b/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ ML2. It is not safe to build arbitrary topologies with two (or more) I.e. the select-transfer-deselect transaction targeting e.g. device address 0x42 behind mux-one may be interleaved with a similar operation targeting device address 0x42 behind mux-two. The - intension with such a topology would in this hypothetical example + intent with such a topology would in this hypothetical example be that mux-one and mux-two should not be selected simultaneously, but mux-locked muxes do not guarantee that in all topologies. -- 2.7.4