From 5e5c74a5e11d1e2a99d03132cc6c4455016db6c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Hancock Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:42:30 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] sata_nv: delay on switching between NCQ and non-NCQ commands This patch appears to solve some problems with commands timing out in cases where an NCQ command is immediately followed by a non-NCQ command (or possibly vice versa). This is a rather ugly solution, but until we know more about why this is needed, this is about all we can do. Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/ata/sata_nv.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c b/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c index f1fea96..b93e64d 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c @@ -219,6 +219,7 @@ struct nv_adma_port_priv { void __iomem * gen_block; void __iomem * notifier_clear_block; u8 flags; + int last_issue_ncq; }; struct nv_host_priv { @@ -1260,6 +1261,7 @@ static unsigned int nv_adma_qc_issue(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) { struct nv_adma_port_priv *pp = qc->ap->private_data; void __iomem *mmio = pp->ctl_block; + int curr_ncq = (qc->tf.protocol == ATA_PROT_NCQ); VPRINTK("ENTER\n"); @@ -1274,6 +1276,14 @@ static unsigned int nv_adma_qc_issue(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) /* write append register, command tag in lower 8 bits and (number of cpbs to append -1) in top 8 bits */ wmb(); + + if(curr_ncq != pp->last_issue_ncq) { + /* Seems to need some delay before switching between NCQ and non-NCQ + commands, else we get command timeouts and such. */ + udelay(20); + pp->last_issue_ncq = curr_ncq; + } + writew(qc->tag, mmio + NV_ADMA_APPEND); DPRINTK("Issued tag %u\n",qc->tag); -- 2.7.4