From 5e0f933e908cdbdec03ad7b7a575d645912b9194 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Cagney Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 15:06:08 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] 2002-11-24 Andrew Cagney * dummy-frame.c (pc_in_dummy_frame): New function. (generic_pc_in_call_dummy): Call pc_in_dummy_frame. (find_dummy_frame): Update comment. (generic_pop_current_frame): Use get_frame_type. * dummy-frame.h (pc_in_dummy_frame): Declare. * frame.c (set_unwind_by_pc): Use pc_in_dummy_frame. (create_new_frame): Use pc_in_dummy_frame. (get_prev_frame): Use pc_in_dummy_frame. (frame_saved_regs_register_unwind): Use get_prev_frame. (deprecated_generic_get_saved_register): Use get_prev_frame. --- gdb/ChangeLog | 13 +++++++++++++ gdb/dummy-frame.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- gdb/dummy-frame.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ gdb/frame.c | 10 +++++----- 4 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index b3f71df..fad9fa9 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,16 @@ +2002-11-24 Andrew Cagney + + * dummy-frame.c (pc_in_dummy_frame): New function. + (generic_pc_in_call_dummy): Call pc_in_dummy_frame. + (find_dummy_frame): Update comment. + (generic_pop_current_frame): Use get_frame_type. + * dummy-frame.h (pc_in_dummy_frame): Declare. + * frame.c (set_unwind_by_pc): Use pc_in_dummy_frame. + (create_new_frame): Use pc_in_dummy_frame. + (get_prev_frame): Use pc_in_dummy_frame. + (frame_saved_regs_register_unwind): Use get_prev_frame. + (deprecated_generic_get_saved_register): Use get_prev_frame. + 2002-11-23 Andrew Cagney * blockframe.c (find_frame_addr_in_frame_chain): Move function diff --git a/gdb/dummy-frame.c b/gdb/dummy-frame.c index 06dacbb..1f29859 100644 --- a/gdb/dummy-frame.c +++ b/gdb/dummy-frame.c @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static struct dummy_frame *dummy_frame_stack = NULL; /* Function: find_dummy_frame(pc, fp, sp) Search the stack of dummy frames for one matching the given PC and - FP/SP. Unlike PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY, this function doesn't need to + FP/SP. Unlike pc_in_dummy_frame(), this function doesn't need to adjust for DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK. This is because it is only legal to call this function after the PC has been adjusted. */ @@ -139,6 +139,24 @@ deprecated_generic_find_dummy_frame (CORE_ADDR pc, CORE_ADDR fp) int generic_pc_in_call_dummy (CORE_ADDR pc, CORE_ADDR sp, CORE_ADDR fp) { + return pc_in_dummy_frame (pc); +} + +/* Return non-zero if the PC falls in a dummy frame. + + The code below which allows DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK is for infrun.c, + which may give the function a PC without that subtracted out. + + FIXME: cagney/2002-11-23: This is silly. Surely "infrun.c" can + figure out what the real PC (as in the resume address) is BEFORE + calling this function (Oh, and I'm not even sure that this function + is called with an decremented PC, the call to pc_in_call_dummy() in + that file is conditional on !CALL_DUMMY_BREAKPOINT_OFFSET_P yet + generic dummy targets set CALL_DUMMY_BREAKPOINT_OFFSET. True?). */ + +int +pc_in_dummy_frame (CORE_ADDR pc) +{ struct dummy_frame *dummyframe; for (dummyframe = dummy_frame_stack; dummyframe != NULL; @@ -241,8 +259,9 @@ void generic_pop_current_frame (void (*popper) (struct frame_info * frame)) { struct frame_info *frame = get_current_frame (); - - if (PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY (frame->pc, frame->frame, frame->frame)) + if (get_frame_type (frame) == DUMMY_FRAME) + /* NOTE: cagney/2002-22-23: Does this ever occure? Surely a dummy + frame will have already been poped by the "infrun.c" code. */ generic_pop_dummy_frame (); else (*popper) (frame); diff --git a/gdb/dummy-frame.h b/gdb/dummy-frame.h index d85fcfb..7f3aee8 100644 --- a/gdb/dummy-frame.h +++ b/gdb/dummy-frame.h @@ -60,6 +60,31 @@ extern void dummy_frame_register_unwind (struct frame_info *frame, extern CORE_ADDR dummy_frame_pc_unwind (struct frame_info *frame, void **unwind_cache); +/* Does the PC fall in a dummy frame? + + This function is used by "frame.c" when creating a new `struct + frame_info'. + + Note that there is also very similar code in breakpoint.c (where + the bpstat stop reason is computed). It is looking for a PC + falling on a dummy_frame breakpoint. Perhaphs this, and that code + should be combined? + + Architecture dependant code, that has access to a frame, should not + use this function. Instead (get_frame_type() == DUMMY_FRAME) + should be used. + + Hmm, but what about threads? When the dummy-frame code tries to + relocate a dummy frame's saved registers it definitly needs to + differentiate between threads (otherwize it will do things like + clean-up the wrong threads frames). However, when just trying to + identify a dummy-frame that shouldn't matter. The wost that can + happen is that a thread is marked as sitting in a dummy frame when, + in reality, its corrupted its stack, to the point that a PC is + pointing into a dummy frame. */ + +extern int pc_in_dummy_frame (CORE_ADDR pc); + /* Return the regcache that belongs to the dummy-frame identifed by PC and FP, or NULL if no such frame exists. */ /* FIXME: cagney/2002-11-08: The function only exists because of diff --git a/gdb/frame.c b/gdb/frame.c index d0e6b83..e45dcf8 100644 --- a/gdb/frame.c +++ b/gdb/frame.c @@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ frame_saved_regs_register_unwind (struct frame_info *frame, void **cache, dummy. (generic_call_dummy_register_unwind ought to have been called instead.) */ gdb_assert (!(USE_GENERIC_DUMMY_FRAMES - && PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY (frame->pc, frame->frame, frame->frame))); + && (get_frame_type (frame) == DUMMY_FRAME))); /* Load the saved_regs register cache. */ if (frame->saved_regs == NULL) @@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ deprecated_generic_get_saved_register (char *raw_buffer, int *optimized, while (frame && ((frame = frame->next) != NULL)) { - if (PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY (frame->pc, frame->frame, frame->frame)) + if (get_frame_type (frame) == DUMMY_FRAME) { if (lval) /* found it in a CALL_DUMMY frame */ *lval = not_lval; @@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ set_unwind_by_pc (CORE_ADDR pc, CORE_ADDR fp, *unwind_register = frame_saved_regs_register_unwind; *unwind_pc = frame_saved_regs_pc_unwind; } - else if (PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY (pc, fp, fp)) + else if (pc_in_dummy_frame (pc)) { *unwind_register = dummy_frame_register_unwind; *unwind_pc = dummy_frame_pc_unwind; @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ create_new_frame (CORE_ADDR addr, CORE_ADDR pc) has previously set it. This is really somewhat bogus. The initialization, as seen in create_new_frame(), should occur before the INIT function has been called. */ - if (USE_GENERIC_DUMMY_FRAMES && PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY (fi->pc, 0, 0)) + if (USE_GENERIC_DUMMY_FRAMES && pc_in_dummy_frame (pc)) /* NOTE: cagney/2002-11-11: Does this even occure? */ type = DUMMY_FRAME; else @@ -976,7 +976,7 @@ get_prev_frame (struct frame_info *next_frame) initialization, as seen in create_new_frame(), should occur before the INIT function has been called. */ if (USE_GENERIC_DUMMY_FRAMES - && PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY (prev->pc, 0, 0)) + && pc_in_dummy_frame (prev->pc)) prev->type = DUMMY_FRAME; else { -- 2.7.4