From 5b34926114e39e12005031269613d2b13194aeba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steven Rostedt Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:37:32 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] tracing: Don't use p->len field to determine output in __print_*() functions If more than one __print_*() function is used in a tracepoint (__print_flags(), __print_symbols(), etc), then the temp seq buffer will not be zero on entry. Using the temp seq buffer's length to know if data has been printed or not in the current function is incorrect and may produce incorrect results. Currently, no in-tree tracepoint causes this bug, but new ones may be created. Cc: Andrew Vagin Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt --- kernel/trace/trace_output.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c index 3efd718..c5a0187 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ ftrace_print_flags_seq(struct trace_seq *p, const char *delim, /* check for left over flags */ if (flags) { - if (p->len && delim) + if (!first && delim) trace_seq_puts(p, delim); trace_seq_printf(p, "0x%lx", flags); } @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ ftrace_print_symbols_seq(struct trace_seq *p, unsigned long val, break; } - if (!p->len) + if (ret == (const char *)(p->buffer + p->len)) trace_seq_printf(p, "0x%lx", val); trace_seq_putc(p, 0); @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ ftrace_print_symbols_seq_u64(struct trace_seq *p, unsigned long long val, break; } - if (!p->len) + if (ret == (const char *)(p->buffer + p->len)) trace_seq_printf(p, "0x%llx", val); trace_seq_putc(p, 0); -- 2.7.4