From 5a2cb25ab9da5046f10e773c9ecfdb3339f3dd7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Fengqi Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 21:10:56 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: remove a useless return statement in btrfs_block_rsv_add Since ret must be 0 here, don't have to return. No functional change and code readability is not hurt. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index 2661671..8e4a858 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -5539,10 +5539,8 @@ int btrfs_block_rsv_add(struct btrfs_root *root, return 0; ret = reserve_metadata_bytes(root, block_rsv, num_bytes, flush); - if (!ret) { + if (!ret) block_rsv_add_bytes(block_rsv, num_bytes, true); - return 0; - } return ret; } -- 2.7.4