From 57cbdfc99a4f19570841ff6dc89eae5f2b9c95cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Duncan P. N. Exon Smith" Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 19:13:42 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] BFI: Saturate when combining edges to a successor When a loop gets bundled up, its outgoing edges are quite large, and can just barely overflow 64-bits. If one successor has multiple incoming edges -- and that successor is getting all the incoming mass -- combining just its edges can overflow. Handle that by saturating rather than asserting. This fixes PR21622. llvm-svn: 223500 --- llvm/lib/Analysis/BlockFrequencyInfoImpl.cpp | 21 +++++++++--- .../extremely-likely-loop-successor.ll | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) create mode 100644 llvm/test/Analysis/BlockFrequencyInfo/extremely-likely-loop-successor.ll diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/BlockFrequencyInfoImpl.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/BlockFrequencyInfoImpl.cpp index 06b8acd..278073c 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/BlockFrequencyInfoImpl.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/BlockFrequencyInfoImpl.cpp @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include "llvm/Analysis/BlockFrequencyInfoImpl.h" #include "llvm/ADT/SCCIterator.h" #include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h" +#include using namespace llvm; using namespace llvm::bfi_detail; @@ -122,8 +123,12 @@ static void combineWeight(Weight &W, const Weight &OtherW) { } assert(W.Type == OtherW.Type); assert(W.TargetNode == OtherW.TargetNode); - assert(W.Amount < W.Amount + OtherW.Amount && "Unexpected overflow"); - W.Amount += OtherW.Amount; + assert(OtherW.Amount && "Expected non-zero weight"); + if (W.Amount > W.Amount + OtherW.Amount) + // Saturate on overflow. + W.Amount = UINT64_MAX; + else + W.Amount += OtherW.Amount; } static void combineWeightsBySorting(WeightList &Weights) { // Sort so edges to the same node are adjacent. @@ -206,11 +211,19 @@ void Distribution::normalize() { Shift = 33 - countLeadingZeros(Total); // Early exit if nothing needs to be scaled. - if (!Shift) + if (!Shift) { + // If we didn't overflow then combineWeights() shouldn't have changed the + // sum of the weights, but let's double-check. + assert(Total == std::accumulate(Weights.begin(), Weights.end(), UINT64_C(0), + [](uint64_t Sum, const Weight &W) { + return Sum + W.Amount; + }) && + "Expected total to be correct"); return; + } // Recompute the total through accumulation (rather than shifting it) so that - // it's accurate after shifting. + // it's accurate after shifting and any changes combineWeights() made above. Total = 0; // Sum the weights to each node and shift right if necessary. diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/BlockFrequencyInfo/extremely-likely-loop-successor.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/BlockFrequencyInfo/extremely-likely-loop-successor.ll new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f1ddd13 --- /dev/null +++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/BlockFrequencyInfo/extremely-likely-loop-successor.ll @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +; RUN: opt < %s -analyze -block-freq | FileCheck %s + +; PR21622: Check for a crasher when the sum of exits to the same successor of a +; loop overflows. + +; CHECK-LABEL: Printing analysis {{.*}} for function 'extremely_likely_loop_successor': +; CHECK-NEXT: block-frequency-info: extremely_likely_loop_successor +define void @extremely_likely_loop_successor() { +; CHECK-NEXT: entry: float = 1.0, int = [[ENTRY:[0-9]+]] +entry: + br label %loop + +; CHECK-NEXT: loop: float = 1.0, +loop: + %exit.1.cond = call i1 @foo() + br i1 %exit.1.cond, label %exit, label %loop.2, !prof !0 + +; CHECK-NEXT: loop.2: float = 0.0000000 +loop.2: + %exit.2.cond = call i1 @foo() + br i1 %exit.2.cond, label %exit, label %loop.3, !prof !0 + +; CHECK-NEXT: loop.3: float = 0.0000000 +loop.3: + %exit.3.cond = call i1 @foo() + br i1 %exit.3.cond, label %exit, label %loop.4, !prof !0 + +; CHECK-NEXT: loop.4: float = 0.0, +loop.4: + %exit.4.cond = call i1 @foo() + br i1 %exit.4.cond, label %exit, label %loop, !prof !0 + +; CHECK-NEXT: exit: float = 1.0, int = [[ENTRY]] +exit: + ret void +} + +declare i1 @foo() + +!0 = metadata !{metadata !"branch_weights", i32 4294967295, i32 1} -- 2.7.4