From 579345e7f2190c1ee97f44154526dcd458ea790d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 16:07:34 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Rename reference_tracking BPF programs BPF programs for reference_tracking selftest use "fail_" prefix to notify that they are expected to fail. This is really confusing and inconvenient when trying to grep through test_progs output to find *actually* failed tests. So rename the prefix from "fail_" to "err_". Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210805230734.437914-1-andrii@kernel.org --- .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c | 4 ++-- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c | 14 +++++++------- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c index de26881..4e91f4d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c @@ -34,8 +34,8 @@ void test_reference_tracking(void) if (!test__start_subtest(title)) continue; - /* Expect verifier failure if test name has 'fail' */ - if (strstr(title, "fail") != NULL) { + /* Expect verifier failure if test name has 'err' */ + if (strstr(title, "err_") != NULL) { libbpf_print_fn_t old_print_fn; old_print_fn = libbpf_set_print(NULL); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c index e83d0b4..8249075 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_test1(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("classifier/fail_use_after_free") +SEC("classifier/err_use_after_free") int bpf_sk_lookup_uaf(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_uaf(struct __sk_buff *skb) return family; } -SEC("classifier/fail_modify_sk_pointer") +SEC("classifier/err_modify_sk_pointer") int bpf_sk_lookup_modptr(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_modptr(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("classifier/fail_modify_sk_or_null_pointer") +SEC("classifier/err_modify_sk_or_null_pointer") int bpf_sk_lookup_modptr_or_null(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_modptr_or_null(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("classifier/fail_no_release") +SEC("classifier/err_no_release") int bpf_sk_lookup_test2(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_test2(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("classifier/fail_release_twice") +SEC("classifier/err_release_twice") int bpf_sk_lookup_test3(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_test3(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("classifier/fail_release_unchecked") +SEC("classifier/err_release_unchecked") int bpf_sk_lookup_test4(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ void lookup_no_release(struct __sk_buff *skb) bpf_sk_lookup_tcp(skb, &tuple, sizeof(tuple), BPF_F_CURRENT_NETNS, 0); } -SEC("classifier/fail_no_release_subcall") +SEC("classifier/err_no_release_subcall") int bpf_sk_lookup_test5(struct __sk_buff *skb) { lookup_no_release(skb); -- 2.7.4