From 53da1d9456fe7f87a920a78fdbdcf1225d197cb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:07:24 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] fix ptrace slowness This patch fixes bug #12208: Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12208 Subject : uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host This turned out to be not a scheduler regression, but an already existing problem in ptrace being triggered by subtle scheduler changes. The problem is this: - task A is ptracing task B - task B stops on a trace event - task A is woken up and preempts task B - task A calls ptrace on task B, which does ptrace_check_attach() - this calls wait_task_inactive(), which sees that task B is still on the runq - task A goes to sleep for a jiffy - ... Since UML does lots of the above sequences, those jiffies quickly add up to make it slow as hell. This patch solves this by not rescheduling in read_unlock() after ptrace_stop() has woken up the tracer. Thanks to Oleg Nesterov and Ingo Molnar for the feedback. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi CC: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- kernel/signal.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index 2a74fe8..1c88144 100644 --- a/kernel/signal.c +++ b/kernel/signal.c @@ -1575,7 +1575,15 @@ static void ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int clear_code, siginfo_t *info) read_lock(&tasklist_lock); if (may_ptrace_stop()) { do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, CLD_TRAPPED); + /* + * Don't want to allow preemption here, because + * sys_ptrace() needs this task to be inactive. + * + * XXX: implement read_unlock_no_resched(). + */ + preempt_disable(); read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); + preempt_enable_no_resched(); schedule(); } else { /* -- 2.7.4